I submitted a letter on February 28, 2024, in support of two bills in the Michigan Legislature that would restore basic legal and human rights to tens of thousands of Michigan-born adoptees like myself and my adoptive sister.
You can read a good summary of those bills on this page published by the Michigan Adoptee Rights Coalition, which has worked with lawmakers to advance the much needed and overdue reform.
None of the seven senators on the Civil Rights, Judiciary, and Public Safety Committee of the Michigan State Senate acknowledged they received my supportive letter and evidence on adoptee rights issues in Michigan. Nor did the committee staff during a hearing on February 29, 2024, in the committee on HB 5148 and HB 5149, say my letter was received, even though other individual persons writing for themselves were mentioned by name.
I made clear in my letter I was an author and issue expert on the history of adoption in Michigan, especially Crittenton General Hospital of Detroit, one of the largest adoption hubs ever to operate in the United States.
The hearing itself was a lopsided affair, tilted to favor foes of adoptee rights: The Michigan Catholic Conference, an advocacy group affiliated with the Catholic Church, a historic promoter of massive family separation efforts at its Catholic Charity-run maternity homes; and Right to Life Michigan. Adoptees and their allies were not given agency in a meaningful way. There were just two voices allowed to present in support of measures. No clear adoptee voice from someone who has endured decades of discriminatory treatment by the state and its health bureaucracy, the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS), was provided any platform to state facts how thousands of adoptees are treated continually by state bureaucrats who consider them to be second-place persons.
Here are some of my take aways from today’s legislative kabuki:
- The horrific harm adoptees have suffered from this state, especially by its public health bureaucrats at MDHHS, was never raised. We’re dirt to them.
- In this mostly fact-free session largely turned over to adoption promoters failed to let any adoptees share basic facts on the the shocking history of adoption in the state. In fact, this issue has not come up yet by any presenter in any hearing in the Capitol. No facts on decades of harm and lies to adoptees have been allowed to be shared publicly in this tightly scripted political theater.
- To lawmakers running this process, it appears that adoptees, who number in the tens of thousands, are still just scary bastards to kick around.
I’m still waiting to see if the legislative statement I provided (see below) will be officially entered into the legislative record. At this point I do not have confidence that the chair of this committee, Sen. Stephanie Chang, views adoptees as human and even worthy of basic equality. You can view it here. Scroll to the end to see and hear for yourself. For me, I got this message: If you’re adopted, you don’t count.
What I don’t know is if the format for today’s hearing was at the whim of the chair or a shared consensus among members of the committee and other parties who negotiated outside of this setting. No lawmaker voiced strong support for adoptee rights today. That is a clear fact.
Letter is as follows:
Dear Esteemed Senators:
I’m a very proud Finnish-American Michigander and equally proud Detroit native.
I also am a Michigan adoptee still denied equal treatment by law because of the state’s inequitable laws denying Michigan adoptees the same treatment, by law, as non-adoptees in the state. This ongoing treatment remains in violation of the state’s constitution.
My humble request is this: VOTE YES/DUE PASS FOR HB 5148 and HB 5149.
I was born at one of country’s largest adoption-promotion facilities, Detroit’s Crittenton General Hospital, in 1965. (It was torn down in 1975.)
I have written a public health examination of that facility: You Don’t Know How Lucky You Are. The book came out in 2018, and I alerted every lawmaker in Michigan about the book then.
My book documents the history of Michigan’s adoption system that allowed for likely tens of thousands of family separations through adoption. I also examine how the state’s health system, the MDHHS, has promoted inequitable treatment of Michigan-born adoptees for decades. That treatment continues daily, especially to aging adoptees born between 1945-1980, the boom years of adoption when the state had the greatest number of families severed by this system.
In my case, I was denied my original birth record for years by the state. Despite the poor treatment by the state’s vital records keepers, I found my biological kin in 1989. This happened in the face of nearly impossible odds and repeated efforts to hide information from me by my adoption agency and state vital records keepers.
It took another 27 years until I received an original copy of my birth certificate in 2016, through a court order, even after I had found my birth kin on my father and mother’s sides of the family back in 1989. Even having known my birth families, MDHHS denied me a copy of my birth certificate. It took countless demands and finally a court order to force the state to surrender my own records.
This is one example of the ongoing discrimination and harm done by the state’s adoption laws and its state health system to thousands of adoptees like me and my adopted sister (born in Saginaw, born in 1963).
We now have a chance to restore decades of wrong to thousands of people with legislation before you. Many adoptees are now aging, and many have already lost birth family members they may never know because of decades of failures to restore legal rights to adoptees to be treated equally by law.
I’ve worked for years, engaging lawmakers directly, contacting the media, and publishing articles on harm that denies basic legal rights to Michiganders–all in violation of the state constitution.
I can speak to you, your staff, and members of your legislative policy team on my expertise on this issue and the research I have documented in my published work.
Lastly, I also have published a long form story about my trip to Finland in September 2023 meeting distant Finnish relatives I never knew I had. My story explores the importance of family kinship and how Michigan’s current adoption secrecy laws sever such kin connections, when families separated by time and even oceans have a natural desire to connect. When I was in Finland in 2023, my relatives gave me a stack of letters my great grandmother sent to Finland during World War II, and even pictures after the war that include photos of my birth mother and other Finnish American relatives in my family. The Michigan/Finnish connections were very strong. I just visited my Finnish family members in Finland, again, in February 2024, and they treated me as family because we are family.
Resources to support restoration of basic legal rights to Michigan-born adoptees; please share with colleagues as needed:
- Website for my 2018 memoir/history/public health analysis of adoption and the history of adoption in Michigan: www.howluckyuare.com
- History of Detroit’s Crittenton General Hospital (my birthplace, major U.S. adoption hub): www.howluckyuare.com/crittenton-general-hospitals-forgotten-legacy/
- History of MDHHS denial of my vital records and my efforts to ultimately get my original birth certificate after 27 years of asking for it after I met my birth families in 1989: www.howluckyuare.com/key-facts-michigans-discrimination-against-adoptees/
- Nearly impossible barriers in getting an original birth certificate by adoptees in Michigan: www.howluckyuare.com/guide-michigan-adoptees-seeking-court-orders-original-birth-certificates/
- Podcast interview with Rudy Owens on adoption and adoptee rights in Michigan (May 2023): https://youtu.be/yql2AuaK5ds
- Interview with Michigan Radio on my book/being denied equal treatment by law (June 2018): www.howluckyuare.com/memoir_media_coverage/
Author Follow Up Note: As of March 4, 2025, my letter was registered as submitted testimony by the committee clerk, who I called to ask why my testimony to lawmakers was not submitted in the published record along with other letters on February 29, 2024. Reportedly, senators all had an individual choice to forward my email-submitted letter to the clerk, or not, to submit the communication on the bills as testimony. None of the senators, Democrats or Republicans, forwarded my testimony in support of the two bills. I appreciate that the clerk accepted my follow up to this omission of testimony and agreed to do this. The letters are posted on the committee’s webpage, for the date of: February 29, 2024. https://committees.senate.michigan.gov/details?com=CRJPS&sessionId=15